A “Sensitive” (and expensive) Response from the State Department

Today a giant envelope from the State Department appeared on my desk. Inside the envelope was the response to my FOIA request for the agency’s report to the Archivist on records management.

First, I must say that I’m glad it only took about 5 and a half months to get the requested documents; my response came in under the average 155 working days, on average, it takes State to process a simple request. Other things about this particular response can easily be classified as “the good, the bad, and the downright mystifying.”

The Good

The requested report was released in full. State joins the ever-growing list of agencies that have declined to protect the report using exemption b5 (interagency documents). State also granted my fee waiver request.

The Bad

Did I mention that the report was mailed to me in a large envelope? As I do on all requests, I had asked for it to be sent to me electronically. State may very well have good reasons that it was not able to email me the records, but I would not know because they do not even acknowledge my request for an electronic version in their response. Adding insult to the injury is that State spent more than $16 dollars using registered mail to send me the copy.

IMAG0165

The Confusing

When I first opened the package I assumed it must be a response to some other request I have open. Why would a report on records management be marked (repeatedly) as “Sensitive?”

Sensitive But Unclassified is one of many markings currently in use throughout the federal government that has no basis in statute or government-wide policy. These markings, which also include the ubiquitous “For Official Use Only,” are commonly called CUI or “Controlled Unclassified Information.” Each agency has its own rules for what is stamped, and how that document should be handled. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), in response to an Executive Order by President Obama, is currently going through a process to streamline the markings. Once it is fully-implemented, stamps like the “Sensitive But Unclassified” one should be a thing of the past.

IMAG0162

Advertisements

Tagged: ,

2 thoughts on “A “Sensitive” (and expensive) Response from the State Department

  1. Kel McClanahan March 25, 2013 at 8:42 pm Reply

    State has taken the CIA’s position that it cannot ever release electronic records because it installed its FOIA processing software on its classified network and can’t get released records back off of it once they’re processed. No kidding. I have sworn declarations about itt.

  2. […] portion of the records we received back were via the US mail (the State Department actually spent $16 to send the records via registered […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: